|
|
Bombard-type Great General Cannon (bottom right) and its various
sub-types. Illustration taken from 'Si Zhen San Guan Zhi
(《四鎮三關志》)'.
|
The Great General Cannon, known in Chinese as
Da Jiang Jun Pao (大將軍砲), stood as one of the Ming Dynasty’s most
powerful indigenously developed artillery pieces. The name encompassed a class
of heavy cannons that evolved over the dynasty's course, with several distinct
types emerging as a result of both improvements to and evolution of the
original design, and the introduction of new designs that gained popularity
and adopted the same name.
The principal variants that emerged under this name are examined in the
sections below:
1. Cast Bronze Great General Cannon (Bombard Type)
(Early to mid-Ming Dynasty — up to around 1584)
The bombard-type Great General Cannon was representative of the early
and original variant of indigenous muzzle-loading cannon. It was typically
made from cast bronze, though occasionally from cast iron, and featured a
roughly bottle-shaped profile.
 |
| A cast-bronze bombard, probably a "Shorty General", preserved in Xuzhou Museum. |
The cannon featured a
nearly untapered profile and lacked a flared muzzle, with several reinforcing
rings cast integrally along its length to strengthen the barrel against the
pressures of firing, and optional lugs for lifting rings similarly cast as
part of the barrel for easier handling and positioning. At the rear, a bulbous
section served as an enlarged powder chamber. At the base was a flat, flared
foot, which enabled the cannon to stand vertically for cleaning and reloading
— a standard practice for Chinese muzzle-loaders, which were handled
upright rather than horizontally.
|
|
A rare cast-iron version of the bombard-type Great General Cannon,
preserved at Dingzhou Ancient City. Source |
The bombard-type Great General Cannons were graded hierarchically using a
typical numerical system: the largest and heaviest cannon was designated
Da Jiang Jun (大將軍, lit. 'Great General'), followed by
Er Jiang Jun (二將軍, lit. 'Secondary General') or
Sai Jiang Jun (賽將軍, lit. 'Near-matching General'), then
San Jiang Jun (三將軍, lit. 'Tertiary General') or
Ai Jiang Jun (矮將軍, lit. 'Shorty General'), reflecting descending
tiers of length, weight, calibre, and firepower within the class.
|
|
A cast-iron "Shorty General" bombard, preserved at Dingzhou Ancient
City. Source |
Regrettably, most surviving cast bronze bombard-type Great General Cannons are
small to medium sized, whereas ironically a handful of large-sized cast iron
examples have survived despite iron being rarer in this form. This difference
likely stems from bronze being more valuable and more easily re-smelted or
recycled than iron. Based on surviving examples, bombard-type Great General
Cannons range from 50 cm to 180 cm in length, 35 kg to 600 kg in weight, and 6
cm to 25 cm in bore size, although written records mention some as long as 7
chi 2 cun (roughly 230 cm). Nevertheless, from the surviving cast-iron
specimens, lengths around
170 cm and bore sizes around
20 cm appear typical for full-sized bombard-type Great General Cannons.
1.1 Wu Di Da Jiang Jun (無敵大將軍)
(Around 1560 — early seventeenth century)
The
Wu Di Da Jiang Jun (無敵大將軍, lit. 'Invincible Great General')
and its slightly smaller-bore naval/Southern China variant, the
Wu Di Shen Fei Pao (無敵神飛砲, lit. 'Invincible Divine Flying
Cannon'), represented a significant evolution from the original bombard-type
Great General Cannon. These breech-loading designs drew direct inspiration
from the
Fo Lang Ji (佛朗機) guns — Portuguese-style breech-loaders
that had spread from Europe to China in the early 16th century. Designed by
the renowned Ming commander Qi Ji Guang (戚繼光), the Wu Di Da Jiang Jun
retained much of the original barrel profile but replaced the bulbous powder
chamber with an open breech to accept detachable, mug-shaped loading
chambers, sacrificing some raw firepower in exchange for markedly easier
handling and a substantially higher rate of fire. These chambers were
typically forged from wrought iron and fitted with reinforcing hoops for
added strength.
Since upright reloading was no longer necessary, the flared foot of the
original bombard-type Great General Cannon was removed or, in some cases,
replaced with an additional lug for lifting ring similar to those sometimes
fitted on other parts of the barrel.
|
A Wu Di Da Jiang Jun, from 'Lian Bing Shi Ji (《練兵實紀》)'.
|
To date, no surviving Ming cannon has been definitively identified as a Wu Di
Da Jiang Jun, even though numerous breech-loading cannons from the period —
including some exceedingly heavy pieces — have survived. As a result, its
precise dimensions, bore size, and shot weight remain largely unknown. Written
records, however, give an approximate barrel weight of roughly 1,000
jin
(about 597 kg), a chamber weight of roughly 50–150
jin (about 30–90 kg), and a
powder charge of 4–6
jin of gunpowder (about 2.4–3.6 kg) per shot, indicating
that it was scaled to match the heaviest class of bombard-type Great General
Cannons. Unlike the earlier muzzle-loading bombard-types, the Wu Di Da Jiang
Jun typically fired hundreds of iron pellets as its primary ammunition,
propelled with the aid of a wooden sabot; for naval combat, it could also
employ a mixed load of a single stone cannonball combined with a reduced
amount of iron pellets.
2. Forged Wrought Iron Great General Cannon
(Around 1584 — end of
the Ming Dynasty)
Designed by military innovator Ye Meng Xiong (葉夢熊)
around 1584, the wrought-iron Great General Cannon, also called
Da Shen Pao (大神砲, lit. 'Great Divine Cannon') and
Ye Gong Shen Chong (葉公神銃, lit. 'Lord Ye's Divine Gun'), was created
by redesigning the wrought-iron loading chamber of the earlier Wu Di Da Jiang
Jun into a single, full-length standalone cannon, adapting existing expertise
in forging wrought-iron guns such as the
Hu Dun Pao (虎蹲砲) to a
significantly heavier artillery piece.
 |
| Wrought-iron type Great General Cannon displayed atop the Great Wall at Juyongguan Pass. |
Constructed
entirely from wrought iron, this type of Great General Cannon featured a
nearly untapered profile and lacked a flared muzzle, though a reinforcing hoop
protecting the muzzle created the subtle appearance of one. Its barrel was
girded along its length by a series of forged wrought-iron hoops that could
optionally incorporate trunnions, lifting rings, or simple iron sights —
replacing the integrally cast reinforcing rings of earlier bombard-type
designs — while the breech featured a distinctive abacus-bead-shaped
enlargement that formed a reinforced powder chamber. The cannon retained its
characteristic flared foot — now made slightly taller — to facilitate stable
upright reloading, although it was now also designed for mounting on a gun
carriage and could be loaded horizontally.
 |
| 3D render of a wrought-iron type Great General Cannon mounted on a Ming-style gun carriage. From 《中国古代兵器大百科》. |
Cannons of this type were graded
hierarchically using characters from the Thousand Character Classic and the
Yijing: the largest and most powerful was designated
Tian Zi Hao Da Jiang Jun (天字號大將軍), followed in descending order
of size, calibre, and firepower by
Di Zi Hao Da Jiang Jun (地字號大將軍) and
Xuan Zi Hao Da Jiang Jun (玄字號大將軍). A fourth grade, called
Ren Zi Hao Da Jiang Jun (仁字號大將軍), also existed, which was
seemingly comparable to Tian Zi Hao Da Jiang Jun. Far more examples of this
type have survived than of the earlier bombard-type, making it the most
representative variant of the Great General Cannon. Most surviving specimens
measure between 110 cm and 195 cm in length, with bore diameters ranging from
8 cm to 14.5 cm and weights from 88.5 kg to 300 kg — though written records
indicate that some reached as much as 600 kg. Many surviving examples are
around 140–145 cm long, with bore diameters typically in the 11–12 cm
range.
The wrought-iron Great General Cannon represented a revolution in
indigenous Chinese artillery technology. Unlike Western wrought-iron guns,
which were typically constructed using thin longitudinal iron staves bound
together by shrunk-on hoops, Chinese wrought-iron cannons employed a
fundamentally different forging method: multiple curved iron plates (either
two or four per layer) were forge-welded together over a solid cylindrical
mandrel to form an initial tube segment, with the seams slightly overlapped
rather than butted edge-to-edge for added strength and better weld integrity.
Additional layers of curved plates were then applied — seams carefully offset
between successive layers — until the barrel reached the desired wall
thickness. Multiple shorter tubes produced in this manner were subsequently
forge-welded end-to-end to achieve the full desired barrel length, after which
the assembled barrel was carefully cold-worked and ground to refine the bore,
smooth the interior surface, and ensure uniformity, before reinforcing hoops
were added.
 |
| Left: Boxted Bombard with visible inner stave seams. Right: A Great General Cannon preserved in Korea, brazenly arrogated as a Korean invention. |
Compared to the Western hoop-and-stave method — which suffered
from bore inconsistencies due to stave misalignment, long continuous
longitudinal seams prone to splitting under pressure, risk of hoop failure
over time, and uneven stress distribution that could cause sudden catastrophic
bursting—the Chinese layered-plate approach produced a more monolithic,
uniform, and resilient barrel with superior resistance to hoop stress and
reduced risk of longitudinal failure, while also cutting down on overall
weight compared to equivalent cast bronze or cast iron guns. Despite being
called a “wrought-iron” gun, the metal used in forging the barrel of the Great
General Cannon can actually be considered low-carbon steel; only the
reinforcing hoops were true wrought iron. This enabled the wrought-iron Great
General Cannon to deliver exceptional power for its weight: typical examples
(with bore diameters around 11–12 cm) could be loaded with 1.2–1.5 kg of
gunpowder per shot, propelling cannonballs weighing as much as 5 kg (roughly
11 pounder), although it was more typically loaded with a bore-matching lead
or iron cannonball plus smaller grapeshot and lead/iron pellets to increase
the total projectile weight, combining the penetrating power of the solid ball
with the wider anti-personnel spread of the scatter load. In fact, it was
later discovered that the cannon was so overbuilt that its reinforcing hoops
weren't even needed and had become dead weight, leading to the development of
a hoopless version called the
Wei Yuan Pao (威遠砲).
2.1 Long-barrelled Great General Cannon
(Probably around 1620 — end of the
Ming Dynasty)
For most of the Ming period, heavier Chinese artillery
typically functioned as a superheavy regimental gun: lightweight and mobile,
offering firepower comparable to a full-sized field piece, yet relatively
short-barrelled and short-ranged. These cannons were deployed when the enemy
breached the overlapping fields of fire from matchlocks, handgonnes, and
lighter anti-personnel pieces, or served as a devastating close-range
counter-charge weapon against advancing forces.
By the 17th century,
however, the arrival of long-barrelled
Hong Yi Pao (紅夷砲) —
European-style muzzle-loading smoothbore culverins (many of which also bore
the title “Great General Cannon” but were not recognised as a distinct class
under that name) — combined with the growing military threat posed by the
rising Jurchen/Manchu forces, brought about a renewed emphasis on accurate
long-range fire. This change was mirrored in native wrought-iron cannons,
which increasingly adopted length-to-bore ratios approaching those of European
designs. Regrettably, the Ming Dynasty fell before this evolution of
wrought-iron cannons could fully mature, and as a result there were only a few
surviving pieces of these later designs.
 |
| A late Ming period long-barrelled wrought iron cannon preserved at Shanxi Province Art Museum. |
The long-barrelled wrought-iron cannon preserved at the Shanxi
Province Art Museum (pictured above) is one of the few surviving pieces from
the late Ming period. It measures 260 cm in length, with a barrel diameter of
20 cm and a bore of 9.5 cm, giving a bore-to-length ratio of approximately
27:1. It has an untapered low-carbon steel barrel reinforced with seven
wrought-iron hoops, lacks the abacus-bead-shaped powder chamber found on
earlier wrought-iron Great General Cannons, and has a flat wrought iron rear
cap instead of the flared foot. The cannon is uninscribed, so its exact
forging date and location are unknown. Due to this (and lacking some
characterising features), it is uncertain whether it is truly a Great General
Cannon or another type of Ming wrought-iron cannon, although it certainly has
the firepower to match and a longer range than a standard wrought-iron Great
General Cannon, and is treated as one by researchers.